11/05/2011

UK Supreme Court Backs Compensation

A Sinn Fein MLA and a Co Derry journalist have won the right to claim compensation for the time they spent in prison in the 1970s, wrongfully charged with murder.

The landmark ruling by the UK Supreme Court said the test for payments to those wrongfully convicted should be redefined.

Raymond McCartney and former Derry Journal reporter Eamonn MacDermott had two previous bids for compensation refused.

They took their case to the highest court in the United Kingdom and five of the nine judges on the panel found in the men's favour to claim compensation.

President of the Supreme Court, Lord Phillips, said the new test should ensure innocent defendants are not precluded from obtaining compensation because they cannot "prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt".

The Supreme Court ruling could have implications for dozens of former prisoners in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and the Ministry of Justice said it welcomed the Supreme Court decision.

Raymond McCartney and Eamonn MacDermott were convicted of murdering RUC officer Patrick McNulty in Derry in 1977.

Mr McCartney was also found guilty of murdering DuPont Managing Director, Jeffrey Agate in the city a week later and spent 17 years in prison.

While in prison he became a 'commanding officer' for the IRA in the Maze and spent 53 days on hunger strike.

Eamonn MacDermott spent 15 years in prison, later working for the Derry Journal.

Speaking to the Journal after the judgement was handed down, Mr MacDermott said compensation couldn't give him back the years he lost in prison, but added that he felt "vindicated".

Mr MacDermott commented: "I think a lot of people find it very hard to believe that you could spend years in prison and not be entitled to some sort of compensation.

"I think this is the first time the Supreme Court has actually dealt with the question of what constitutes a miscarriage of justice, so it will be interesting to see what way they phrase it and what way they deal with it.

"How narrow or how broad the definition is remains to be seen."

Another man involved in the case on Tuesday, Andrew Adams, from Newcastle-upon-Tyne, who spent 14 years in jail after being wrongly convicted of murder, lost his appeal. The court found Mr Adams did not fall within this new definition.

The Supreme Court ruling means people will receive statutory compensation under section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 if the Justice Secretary accepts that a new fact has so undermined the evidence against them "that no conviction could possibly be based upon the evidence in their cases".

(JG/BMcC)

Related Irish News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.

15 September 2009
Judge To Rule Again On Zoe Protection
Eamon Carroll's troubled property group Zoe is to go back to the High Court today to find out if it will be allowed a fourth bid to gain court protection. Mr Justice Frank Clarke last week again rejected an application from the heavily indebted group for the appointment of an examiner to seven of the Zoe companies.
08 July 2016
Fitzgerald Unveils Prison Officer Recruitment Campaign
Justice Minister Frances Fitzgerald has unveiled a new recruitment campaign which aims to recruit up to 360 prison officers over the next three years.
13 November 2012
€3.8m Compensation Upheld For Paralysed Man
A man left severely brain damaged 12 years ago after his then-girlfriend threw a bottle during a row has been awarded €3.8m under a criminal injuries compensation scheme. 43-year-old Jason Clarke suffered the assault on New Year's Eve 2000 outside the Blue Light pub in Glencullen, Dublin.
07 August 2009
Referendum Sought Over Civil Appeal Court
A high-level judicial committee is calling for a referendum to establish a full-time Court of Appeal. At present the Supreme Court deals with all civil appeals from the High Court. The average waiting-time for an appeal to the Supreme Court has increased from four to 30 months in the past five years.
29 September 2010
Callely Court Date Set For Next Week
The next hearing of Ivor Callely's case against the Seanad Committee over his expenses claims has been scheduled for next Tuesday. Senator Callely took the proceedings after being suspended from the Seanad by the committee for 20 days over a number of allegedly fraudulent expense claims.